Introduction

Writing a technical document is hard. Reading a poorly written
technical document is harder, and probably more painful than writing
one. It takes a lot of work to create a clear, accurate, engaging piece
of technical writing. Thus, in order to make life a little easier for
all parties involved, I am going to share with you the 7 Rules that I
follow when creating a piece of technical documentation. I did not
think these rules up on my own. Rather, I formulated them from having
had the benefit of working with many gifted technical and copy editors
for more than a decade. Anything that I understand is because others
have shown me the way. I cannot be more grateful.

Hopefully after reading this article, you will have some new tools
in your technical writing toolbox that will help you create technical
documents that are clearer, more engaging, less confusing and a lot
more fun to read. Also, I’ve added at no extra charge to you, the
consumer, a bonus section at the end that describes the process I use
to create a piece of technical writing.

Okay, so here are the 7 Rules:

  1. Dry sucks
  2. Before you start, be clear about what you want your reader to do after you end
  3. Write to a well formed outline, always
  4. Avoid ambiguous pronouns
  5. clarity = illustrations + words
  6. When dealing with concepts… logical illustration and example
  7. Embrace revision

1. Dry sucks

This is probably the hardest rule to formalize and the most
important rule to follow. In the modern world of the Internet there are
many forces at work vying for the attention of your reader. Boring,
business as usual writing will not work. For better or worse, your
reader wants to be entertained as well as informed. Therefore, if you
create writing that is unclear and not fun, the reader will simply
click the proverbial “next”; button and move on to another web page,
another TV show or his or her Facebook page.

The easiest way that I’ve found to keep the reader entertained is to
keep myself entertained. I make a significant effort always to write an
article that I will want to read. I strive to have fun when I am
writing. If I’m bored, the reader will be bored. If I’m confused, the
reader will be confused. If I don’t really care about the topic at
hand, the reader will never care. It’s that simple.

I like humor, so I try to make my writing humorous without
compromising clarity. I try to talk to the reader, not at the reader. I
write about topics that really matter to me. I use illustrations
extensively in order to avoid confusing the reader.

Again, I try always to make the reading experience fun. I am aware
always that I am writing in a competitive environment. There’s a lot of
content out there that wants a piece of the reader’s attention. Thus,
my advice for Rule #1 is, if you make your writing fun for you, it will
be fun for the reader.

2. Before you start, be clear about what you want your reader to do after you end

Technical writing is all about the subsequent behavior of the
reader. The reader is investing time reading your work because he or
she wants to be able to do something after the reading experience is
over. That something may be learning how to make chocolate chip cookies, power down a nuclear reactor or set up a Hadoop cluster.
The important thing to remember is that the reader is using your
writing as a means to another end. Your piece is a vehicle to another
well defined behavior.

Thus, it will do you well to be very clear about what you want your
reader to do after the reading experience is over. State your intention
at the beginning. Don’t leave the reader guessing. Your declaration can
be something as simple and obvious as, “after reading this article you
will be able to [fill in the blank here].” If you are clear
about what you want your reader to do after you end, the easier it will
be for you to write your piece at the beginning.

3. Write to a well formed outline, always

A well formed outline is the skeleton around which your document
grows. Writing a technical document without using an outline is like
trying to navigate the New York City Subway System without a map. You can end up anywhere and that anywhere may not be where you intended to go.

Writing to an outline is not about creating more work. It’s about
doing less work. When you write to an outline, you know where you’ve
come from and where you are going to.

There are two rules of outlining that I always use.

  1. A sublevel topic requires at least one peer.
  2. Any outline level requires at least two sentences.

Allow me to elaborate. Listing 1 below is an example of an outline that violates the first rule: A sublevel topic requires at least one peer.

Listing 1: A poorly formed outline

1. Making an Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle

1.1. The steps required for the Fizzle

1.1.1. Preparing the ingredients

1.1.2. Mixing the Fizzle

1.1.3. Serving the Fizzle

Notice please that in Listing 1, Level 1, has a single sublevel, 1.1 – The steps required for the Fizzle.
This structure is a violation of the first rule. In order for a
sublevel to be well formed, there must be at least one other peer for a
topic. In other words, this means that there must be at least two
sublevels for any given level.

Please look at Listing 2 below. Notice that there are now three sublevels to Level 1, of which the topic, Mixing the fizzle, now has peers. The single level, The steps required for the Fizzle, has been eliminated.

You may ask, “Where is the topic, The steps required for the fizzle?” The answer is that the topic is no longer an outline item but content within the parent topic as shown in Listing 2 below.

Listing 2: A well formed outline that violates the two sentence rule

1. Making an Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle

The section below describes the process that you need follow to make an orange cranberry tangerine fizzle.

1.1. Preparing the ingredients

1.2. Mixing the Fizzle

1.3. Serving the fizzle

Please notice that although Listing 2 presents an outline with a
properly structured sublevel, there is only a single sentence as
content for the Level 1 topic. Having a single sentence only as content
to an outline topic violates the second rule of outlining, Any outline level requires at least two sentences.

Listing 3 below shows the Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle piece adjusted to support the Two Sentence rule.

Listing 3: A well formed outline that supports the Two Sentence Rule

1.Making an Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle

An Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle can be a
welcome treat on a hot summer day. The beverage is made from natural
ingredients with no artificial flavors. An Orange Cranberry Tangerine
Fizzle not only tastes good, but it’s good for you too!

The sections below describe the process that you need follow to make an Orange Cranberry Tangerine fizzle.

1.1. Preparing the ingredients

1.2. Mixing the Fizzle

1.3. Serving the fizzle

Why all the hubbub about proper outline structure and at least two
sentences to a level? First, following the Sublevel rule forces me to
be very clear about the logical segmentation of my piece. Also the
Sublevel rule ensures that my writing communicates my ideas with a flow
that makes sense and is easy to follow.

Second, The Two Sentence rule forces me to create copy that is
engaging, detailed and makes sense. “One sentence” writing often lacks
detail. And, with the exception of one- liner comedy, writing of the
“one sentence” variety is not the most interesting copy to read.

4. Avoid ambiguous pronouns

Ambiguous pronoun references are probably the most typical cause of confusion in the practice of technical writing.

Consider the paragraph in Listing 4.

Listing 4: A paragraph that has ambiguous pronouns

Trafalgabors
are a fundamental component of the Weebietatas framework. This article
shows you what they are about and how to use them.

This paragraph may seem a bit comical, but it illustrates some
important points. First, the paragraph attempts to put you in a place
that the reader occupies. The reader wants to understand what’s going
on but is unfamiliar with the language in play. And because the
language is unfamiliar, the reader is ignorant and thus, vulnerable.
The reader wants new information; he or she wants to get smarter. But
the reader is also a bit anxious. Admitting ignorance, even to one’s
self, even at a subconscious level, can be disconcerting. The reader is
cognitively fragile. Concepts and words that you, the writer, take for
granted, might be completely foreign to the reader. One ill explained
concept or one word used without proper clarification can turn the
reader off.

In
the case of the paragraph above, I would not be surprised were you to
be asking, “What is a Trafalgabor? What is a Weebietata? What is the
paragraph talking about? How to use Trafalgabors? How to use
Weebietatas? How to use both of them? This is confusing. I am going
back to my Facebook page.”

If a reader has to take time out from your writing to figure out
what you are trying to communicate, not only is expository flow
compromised, the reader most probably will become confused. Once you
confuse the reader, you’ve lost. All the other stuff in the world
demanding the reader’s attention becomes more attractive than your
work. So, the “next” button is clicked and your work goes unread.

In the case of Listing 4 shown above, the confusion is caused by the ambiguous use of the pronoun, they in the second sentence. Does they
refer to the Trafalgabors, the Weebietatas or both? Remember please
that the reader knows nothing of Trafalgabors or Weebietatas. (Please
see Figure 1 below.)


Avoid Ambiguous Pronouns
Click here for larger image

Figure 1: The use of ambiguous pronouns makes technical writing confusing

The solution to the problem is simple. Please take a look at Listing
5 below. The ambiguous pronoun is removed. Clarity is restored.

Listing 5: A remedy for ambiguous pronouuns

Trafalgabors
are a fundamental component of the Weebietatas framework. This article
shows you what Trafalgabors are about and how to use them

Beware! The ambiguous use of pronouns is a sign post on the road to confusing technical writing.

5. clarity = illustrations + words

Please take a look at the photo below. Tell me if you can, what is the graphic about?


Photo without context

I am not surprised should you find yourself a bit perplexed. It’s a
perplexing photo. You know what the items are, but you have no idea
what they mean. Such is the nature of an illustration. A picture
without words lacks context.

When it comes to illustrations, readers require context in order to
avoid confusion. The reader should not need to waste time or thought
trying to figure out what an illustration is about. The easiest way to
avoid confusing illustrations is to provide a caption.

Please take a look at the Figure 2 below. It is the same photo. There is little question as to what the photo is about.


Photo without context
Click here for larger image

Figure 2: The tools and ingredients required to make an Orange Cranberry Tangerine Fizzle

When it comes to technical writing, I have found it to be a good
practice to provide numbered, descriptive captions with all
illustrations.

Please, don’t create captions that are figure numerals only. Use
both a figure numerals and a descriptive comment in the caption. Also,
you’ll do well to avoid orphaning illustrations. An orphan illustration
is a figure that exists within the piece of technical writing yet has
no reference from within the copy.

If you insert an illustration into your writing, make sure to refer
to it in your copy by figure number and location using words such as, above and below.
You don’t want to reader taking time out from reading your work to try
to associate an illustration to copy or to locate an illustration
within your article. If you add have a “Figure 4” in your piece, make
sure that you have language in the text that says something like, please refer to Figure 4 below.

Note: The eye is attracted to pictures

A decade back I worked in the group that wrote hard copy user
manuals for a very, very big computer manufacturer. All manuals were
subject to formal, quantitative usability study. One of the things that
the User Experience Ph. Ds taught me is that as a subject reads a
manual, the reader’s eye goes to the pictures first. Then the reader
will read the copy around the picture. Thus, the manual writer’s tried
to make sure that every page of a manual had at least one picture.

6. When dealing with concepts… logical illustration and example, logical illustration and example

Concepts are hard to understand….that’s why they’re called,
concepts. So, when it comes time for me to write about a concept,
whether it is, the Second Law of Thermodynamics,
a piece of coding technique or a full fledged software framework, I use
the following pattern in my writing: concept – logical illustration –
example. I try to never introduce a concept without substantiating the
concept with a logical illustration and then an example.

Let’s apply this rule to describe an elementary algebraic concept.

The Transitive Property of Equality is as follows:

If A = B, and B = C, then A = C

Now let’s provide a logical illustration that describes the concept. (Please see Figure 3.)


Transitive Property of Equality
Click here for larger image

Figure 3: Thee Transitive Property of Equality is a fundamental principle of elementary algebra

Listing 6 below shows a few concrete examples to solidify the understanding of the concept at hand.

Listing 6: Some concrete examples of the Transitive Property of Equality

  • If 7 = 3 + 4, and 3 + 4 = 5 + 2, then 7 = 5 + 2
  • If 12 + 5 = 7 + 10, and 7 + 10 = 6 + 11, then 12 + 5 = 6 + 11
  • If x + y = z, and z = 2a, then x + y = 2a

Thus, the rule as has been satisfied. We presented the concept, The
Transitive Property of Equality, provided a descriptive illustration
and followed up with concrete examples that substantiate the concept.

Let’s move on to a concept that is more relevant to software development and a bit more difficult to understand. The concept is Maven POM Inheritance.
In Exhibit 1 below you are presented with the concept at hand and then
a logical illustration that describes the concept. Finally, you are
presented with another illustration that shows the concrete use of a
POM files in an inheritance situation.

Exhibit 1: An excerpt of technical writing that describes Maven POM Inheritance

Understanding POM File Inheritance

A POM file (Project Object Model) is the XML file that you use to describe and work with a Maven
project. You can set up a Maven project to inherit settings from a
separate parent POM file. The ability to inherit settings from a parent
POM file is called, POM Inheritance. You use the element in your POM file to define a parent POM file from which to inherit settings.

Figure 4 below illustrates a fictitious project hierarchy that
represents an example of how you can set up a master POM file from
which other POM files can inherit common settings.


POM Inheritance
Click here for larger image

Figure 4:You can designate a master POM from which you can inherit common settings

Figure 5 below shows the contents POM.xml files for the Maven projects, stooges-web, stooges-api and stooges-dal. Each project is configured to use the element to inherit settings from stooges-project.


POM Files in Action
Click here for larger image

Figure 5: Use the element to direct a Maven project to inherit settings from an external POM file.

The example above relies heavily upon figures to provide logical
illustration and a concrete example of the concept at hand. Creating
interesting, engaging and accurate illustrations and examples are a
difficult undertaking, but well worth the effort. Many times creating
the illustrations for a piece of technical writing and providing
example code will take as much, if not more time than writing the
actual copy. Thus, I plan accordingly when allocating my time to meet a
deadline.

When it comes to making a concept crystal clear, illustrate and then provide an example.

7. Embrace revision

It’s rare to produce a good piece of technical writing right off the
bat. Understanding your topic, organizing your ideas and then finding
the language to present the ideas clearly and accurately takes time as
well as a lot of effort. Therefore, don’t constrain yourself by
expecting to get everything right the first time. Rather, plan to write
at least three versions of your piece. The first version just gets some
words in print so that you can understand your intentions. The second
version brings clarity and accuracy to your work. Then, once you have
your facts right, your illustrations clear and your organization
logical, create a third version that makes your work engaging and
special.

To hijack the Thomas Edison quote, “Technical writing is 10% composition and 90% revision!”

Bonus section

Now that you learned about the 7 Rules for Creating World Class
Technical Documentation, I am going to share with you the process that
I use to create a piece of technical writing. It’s short, but to the
point. I call the process, The 7 Steps for Making a Technical Document. Here goes:

  1. I create outline, at least to the second level, hopefully to the third.
  2. I add to the outline my illustration for each concept.
  3. I caption my illustrations.
  4. I fill in the copy to the outline, following the Two Sentence Rule, adjusting my outline to adapt to the copy at hand.
  5. I revise.
  6. I send the piece to a subject matter expert for review. (A
    subject matter expert is a person that can identify inaccuracies and
    unclear writing.)
  7. I revise again based on the response of the reviewer(s).

There you have it. 7 Rules, 7 Steps. Who could ask for more? So, now
that you’ve learned all of my tricks, feel free to go forth and make
the world a more accurate, engaging, illustrative and interesting place
in which to live. It’s worth the effort.

Leave a Reply

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注